Study | Sample type | Results of contamination | S. aureus counts |
---|---|---|---|
Edema and Atayese (2006) | Eggs (Cracked eggs) | Steaming showed a competent method of reducing bacterial load than frying (which had no effect) | Fried eggs—1.9 × 107 CFU/ml, steamed (20 min)—2.4 × 107 CFU/ml, steamed (30 min)—2.0 × 107 CFU/ml, baked eggs—1.9 × 107 CFU/ml |
Edema et al. (2008) | Suya (Beef) | Contamination at every point of the processing; Including washing raw meat, slicing, steaking, and smoking | Location one—1.80 × 105 CFU/g/ml), location two—1.53 (105 CFU/g/ml) |
Salihu et al. (2010) | Fried ground beef (Danbum nama) | The presence of S. aureus in 69.9% (151/216) of the isolates exceeds the acceptable limits (Moroccan Department order, 2004) | 105—107 CFU/g |
Ologhobo et al. (2010) | Chicken and Beef suya | The presence of S. aureus isolates in sample pre-heating and post-heating is indicative of the need for critical control points in the processing methods | Chicken before heating—3.34 × 104 CFU/g Chicken after heating—3.67 × 103 CFU/g Beef before heating—3.33 × 101 CFU/g Beef after heating—3.33 × 101 CFU/g |
Eze and Nwosu (2012) | Fresh goat meat | The presence of S. aureus isolates in samples was considered to be a result of contamination from handlers during processing and storage | Not indicated but 10.3% (9/54) occurrence was reported |
Obadina et al. (2014) | Raw meat, sliced meat, staked meat, spiced meat, smoked/grilled meat (suya) | Raw meat is a significant entry point for contamination in the processing technique | Fresh meat—16. 01 × 105 CFU/g, sliced meat—11. 43 × 105 CFU/g, staked meat—16.46 × 105 CFU/g, spiced meat—15.72 × 105 CFU/g, smoked meat—3.26 × 105 CFU/g |
Adeyeye et al. (2015) | Smoked fish | Reduced moisture content as a result of the processing technique was considered desirable | Fresh samples (CFU/g) Silver catfish—5.4 × 1020, Spotted tilapia—4.7 × 102, Bonga shad—8.1 × 102, Tongue sole—7.1 × 102, Fresh barracuda—6.3 × 102; Smoked samples (CFU/g) Silver catfish—23.4 × 102, Spotted tilapia—57.3 × 102, Bonga shad—49.0 × 102, Tongue sole—48.0 × 102, Barracuda—21.1 × 102 |
Adeyeye (2017) | Grilled/barbecued meat (beef Suya) | Reduced moisture content as a result of the processing technique was considered desirable | Traditional smoked suya—2.71 ± 0.19 (log10 CFU/g), Electric grilling machine suya—1.49 ± 0.15 (log10 CFU/g), Hot air oven suya—1.28 ± 0.14 (log10 CFU/g) |
Oyet et al. (2020) | Roasted fish and meat (suya) | Within acceptable limits; Need for improved quality control | 6.00 to 8.00 log 10 CFU/g |
Ogofure and Igbinosa (2021) | Frozen beef, fish, and chicken | Rinsing affected the bacterial concentration | Before rinsing (CFU/g) 11.53 ± 1.25 (beef) 11.16 ± 0.95 (fish) 11.42 ± 1.58 (chicken); After rinsing (CFU/g) 2.70 ± 0.45 (beef) 2.68 ± 0.25 (fish) 2.79 ± 0.49 (chicken) |